When lying and duplicity become second nature – An insider has his (her?) say
It is the hallmark of utter depravity when one no longer distinguishes truth from falsehood; natural from unnatural; right from wrong.
For there comes a juncture at which deception ceases to be an act.
It becomes instinct. Second nature. Culture.
And so it has come to pass that Charlotte Kok – and those around her – no longer perceive any meaningful distinction between reality and make-believe. Facts are no longer discovered but arranged. Events are not remembered but rewritten. Reality itself becomes something to be managed, curated and, where necessary, compassionately corrected.
Without “eyes to see” or “ears to hear”, discernment has become the rarest of commodities, let alone a foundation of moral character.
Charlotte Kok- and those around her – do not “lie”. Not because they have discovered honesty. But because the distinction is immaterial.
When one spends enough time rearranging reality, eventually reality returns the favour.
But today’s dissertation is less about Charlotte than it is about “those around her”.
Because Charlotte, at least, knows what she is doing.
Charlotte’s hangers-on entourage
Would it constitute a revelation of method to remark that Charlotte’s useful idiots entourage includes many occupying the layer above her station at Findex – Crowe?
For it is this very stratum of power that enables Charlotte.
Curious, perhaps, that those possessing the authority to restrain her so often become her most enthusiastic facilitators.
One might expect seniority to confer wisdom. Or discernment. Or at the very least, functioning eyesight.
And yet Charlotte appears to flourish precisely because those around her discover remarkable talents for selective blindness, strategic silence and the occasional outbreak of administrative amnesia.
Take stock of the ecosystem carefully.
Charlotte performs. Others applaud. And thus moral rot and ethical bankruptcy acquire institutional support.
Charlotte’s enablers
For Charlotte alone could never have achieved such heights.
No great architect of disorder operates in isolation. Even the most gifted practitioner of narrative manipulation requires assistants. Admirers. Custodians of illusion.
And so one finds, surrounding Charlotte, a peculiar class of institutional personality: individuals who possess just enough perception to recognise what is occurring, but not quite enough courage to interrupt it.
Observe them closely.
Some mistake compliance for loyalty.
Others confuse silence with wisdom.
Many discover that looking away is vastly less disruptive than looking directly.
For reality, properly acknowledged, can create paperwork. Meetings. Difficult conversations. Accountability.
And accountability is among the least fashionable commodities in modern corporate life.
Far easier, perhaps, to participate in the ritual.
Charlotte speaks. Heads nod. Documentation materialises.
Concerns become “opportunities”. Contradictions become “misunderstandings”. Inconvenient facts quietly undergo administrative redevelopment.
Observe the elegance.
Observe the craftsmanship.
For when enough people agree to suspend disbelief simultaneously, moral collapse no longer announces itself as corruption.
It arrives disguised as process.
A question to Tony Roussos and Matt Games… and Spiro Paule… and the Board. You know who you are
Precisely how many Charlotte Koks must flourish before “isolated incidents” become culture at Findex-Crowe?
Or is it already too late?
Leave a comment